Untitled design.png

Social Media Animal Cruelty Coalition (SMACC)

Home 

Social Media Animal Cruelty Coalition (SMACC) home page

 

Welcome to the Asia for Animals Social Media Animal Cruelty Coalition (SMACC).  

In May 2020 the AfA coalition formed this working group with the aim of bringing organisations together to try to get a handle on the situation of animal cruelty videos being promoted, shared and often monetised on social media platforms. The group was formed as a result of the many enquiries we, and many network orgs, receive from the public regarding animal cruelty videos and the lack of successful campaigns by organisations working in silo to stop this issue.

 

This group is a collaboration by various members of the Asia for Animals Coalition network.

Please explore our site:

 

Definitions of animal cruelty online

 

The animal cruelty commonly found in social media content can be broadly categorized as follows:

CATEGORIES

OBVIOUS AND INTENTIONAL CRUELTY

a clear violation of platform's existing policies

AMBIGUOUS AND INTENTIONAL CRUELTY

a possible violation of platform's existing policies

OBVIOUS AND UNINTENTIONAL CRUELTY

a possible violation of platform's existing policies

AMBIGUOUS AND UNINTENTIONAL CRUELTY

not a violation of platform's existing policies - promotes cruel and illegal activity behind the scenes (pet trade/capture)

EXAMPLES

burying a live baby monkey;
intentionally setting dogs on live kitten;
burning live animals

teasing a caged monkey;
filming a feral kitten being devoured by street dogs;
animal performances/wild animals as entertainers;
fake/staged rescues

making a macaque "smile", which may be a genuine misinterpretation of a fear/stress behaviour

selfies with wild animals;
keeping baby macaque as pet

Animal cruelty themes

 

Our research has identified the following recurring themes in animal cruelty videos:

  • Animals as entertainers (not in circuses)

  • Animals as entertainers/actors (legal or illegal)

  • Deliberate animal torture (physical)

  • Deliberate animal torture (mental)

  • Fake rescue

  • Hunting

  • Illegal keeping or sale

  • Prolonging death

  • Eating live animals

  • Teasing

  • Unintentional abuse

  • Wild pets

  • Cruelty content used for legitimate campaigning or educational purposes

 

See below for further information.

THEMES
WHY IS THIS CRUEL?
Animals as entertainers (not in circuses)

eg. Macaques riding a bike on the streets;
Animals doing tricks and being filmed

The inherent biological needs of most wild animals cannot be met when they are held captive, trained, and used as performers, which results in poor welfare, regardless of whether cruel training methods are used (which they often are). Images of wild animals in human environments, dressed in human clothing and/or interacting with humans perpetuates the idea that they can thrive under such conditions, which perpetuates the trade in wild animals as pets and further cruelty. This is the case whether such use and such performances are legal or illegal.

 
Animals as entertainers/actors (legal or illegal)

eg. The use of animals as actors or performers

Animals in circuses across the world are made to perform for the public.

Deliberate animal torture (physical)

eg. Intentional physical torture

Intentionally causing physical pain is a classic example of cruelty.

 
Deliberate animal torture (mental)

eg. Intentional psychological torture or torment

Intentionally causing psychological distress is a classic example of cruelty.

Fake rescue

eg. Staged "rescue" scenes;
animals put into distressing situations for the sake of a rescue narrative

Animals are purposely put in dangerous situations or sometimes purposely being injured so that the filmmakers can appear to the viewers that they are rescuing them from the situation or helping them with their injuries. Oftentimes these animals are infants (macaque babies, kittens, puppies) who may have been removed from their mothers or family groups as they make easy targets as they are vulnerable.

 
Wild pets

The inappropriate keeping and/or handling of wild animals as pets, which is detrimental to their welfare. The inherent cruelty is usually not intentional or recognised

It is impossible for the inherent biological needs of most wild animals to be met when they are kept as people's pets. Every species of animal has evolved to be able to thrive in a specific kind of social and physical environment. For example, macaques are hard-wired to live in large and complex social groups with others of their own kind, to climb, to range, and to eat specific foods. Despite the best intentions on the part of an animal's keeper, these conditions cannot be recreated in the context of pet-keeping - and being treated "as a member of the family" cannot make up for it. Poor welfare often goes unrecognised when pet owners are unaware of a species' natural needs, behaviours and ways of communicating.

 
Hunting

Legal and considered to be culturally acceptable in some places, often depending on who is hunting and what animals they are hunting

Animals, either in the wild are hunted and killed illegally or legally, or, animals kept in captivity - such as in game reserves where often they are bred specifically for the purpose of allowing humans to hunt and kill them for sport.

 
Illegal keeping or sale

For example, baby macaques for sale in areas where this is prohibited (including the majority of habitat countries)

Apart from violating the law, illegal keeping or sale of animals often entails the same cruelty described above under "exotic pets."

 
Prolonging death

Gratuitous enjoyment of prolonged suffering;
Prolonging the pain of an animal who needs to be euthanised

Videos that show humans witnessing an animal in severe suffering or distress and taking no action to alleviate the suffering. This theme can overlap with other themes such as abusive situations where the likelihood is very high that the animal will eventually die as a result of the situation it is being filmed in. Deliberately prolonging death is a classic example of cruelty.

 
Eating live animals

Several YouTube channels regularly feature people eating live marine animals.

Preparing and consuming a live animal or animals

 
 

Causing an animal clear stress through teasing;
the person often does not know the degree to which they are harming the animal

What may be intended as "lighthearted teasing" can cause serious distress in captive animals, especially when they depend on humans and/or lack a means of escape.

Teasing
 
Unintentional abuse

Treating pet monkey like a child; dressing them in clothing, applying makeup, watching them "smile", etc

See also "exotic pets." Often in this situation the keeper/owner of the animal, through lack of knowledge, is not aware they are abusing the animal and under the impression they are providing 'love' when in fact, the animal is suffering from physical or psychological abuse.

 

Any of the above, but clearly used for legitimate campaigning purposes. Such posts should not link to the original perpetrator (thus increasing their reach and profitability)

Cruelty content used for legitimate campaigning or educational purposes

This is content that is being used, often by animal welfare organisations, to highlight and educate animal cruelty to the public. Often videos such as these are used in campaigns or in fundraising efforts. The content being highlighted may be cruel, but is being used to work towards an end to such cruelty. Animal welfare organisations have differing views on the acceptability of using cruelty footage in this way.

 

Are you one of our researchers? 

Our SMACC researchers are invaluable to our work. All researchers are hired on a volunteer basis through our coalition. This area is not open to the public.

 

SMAC Coalition members